Saturday, September 5, 2015

Mul Bhartiya Vichar Manch :

Only half mads criticize Hindus without knowing that Brahmin Dharm is separate from Hindu Dharm .

We see many half mads criticizing Hindus without knowing that Hindu Dharm is separate from Brahmin Dharm . They have no courage to accept this and say this . They confuse Brahmin Dharm with Hindu Dharm.

Brahmins are not Hindus . They are not Hindustani . How their religion can be Hindu Religion ? Even every Brahmin says he follows Vedic Arya - Brahmin Dharm of Varn and Bhedbhav ,

Has any  Native Hindu Saint told us accept this Varn system ? Accept this Bhedbhav system ? No . On the contrary they have told us right from Shiv - Ram - Krishna ,  Mahaveer , Buddha , Kabir , Ravidas , Nanak , Namdev , Tukaram to Gadgebaba and Tukadoji Maharaj that the Brahmin Dharm is not Hindu Dharm ,

Then what is Native Hindu Dharm ? It was being followed since Sindhu Civilization period . There was no Varn and Caste system , Bhedbhav, Uchnich . Sindhu Civilization inscriptions show us our great lord and Guru surrounded Men- Women , Birds , Snakes and Animals like elephant , bull , and other animals but notrace of Vedic Brahmin Horse whose sacrifice they were giving in their Hom - Havan to which they called Ashwamedh  . Hindus do not have such systems no alcoholic drink like Somras drunken by Videshi Brahmins and sleeping of their wives with dead horse and pujaris . Hindu Dharm criticize all such inhuman rituals . Then how , Hindus can be called followers of Vedic Brahmin Dharm ?

Hindu Dharm was destroyed  by Brahmins while doing destruction , fire and killing when they forcefully entered our peaceful holy land Hindustan .They declared themselves as superior to Native Hindus like Hitler and named our solders , rulers as Kshatriya , our native traders as Vaishya and farmers , common men , labors , craftsmen as Shudras and those who resisted this system as Out Castes , Asprushya and Adiwashi ,Bhut , Rakshas etc to degrade them they put severe ban on then even on their entry in cities .

But Hindu Religion can never be wiped out from the mind of native people and their day to day social life . Majority Hindus never accepted Brahmins as their leaders and superiors and continued to live life with out calling Brahmin in any function and did their own religious function on their own following old Hindu system which Brahmins call as Puranic Rituals and not Vedic Rituals . Even they performed same Puranic Rituals at the time of bath of Rajarshi Shahu Maharaj . Shahu felt bad and insulted as on one hand these Brahmins were calling him part of Vedic Brahmin Dharm on the other hand trated him separate from Brahmin Dharm and as Native Hindu inferior to Brahmin .

Hindu Dharm is revealed by many Native Hindu Non Brahmins right from Shiv , Ram , Krishna , Mahaveer , Buddha , Nanak and Dharmatma codified the Satya Hindu Dharm in his holy Vaani called as Bijak . Now this is the only Code Book of Satya Hindu Dharm.

In some of the earlier Hindu Dharm revelers , Brahmins tried to mix Varn and Jaati system . Geeta is one of that example . Therefore only Bijak is now Hindu Dharm Code Book.

What Bijak says . Naari means Desire . Ram means which is Not Dead means Chetana which never ends and Karm which gives bad and good results doing that . Our Hindu Dharm is very simple , very easy to follow and understand , Even a chanting one stanza from  Bijak is sufficient for any occasion like birth ceremony , naming , wedding , daily pooja which can be performed by oneself without Videshi Brahmin Pandit - Pujari and only that pooja performed by self , sumiran by self can give you results and action or pooja on behalf by you done by Brahmin can give .

Let us follow our own Hindu Dharm and regain self respect , pride and peace once again to Hindu society and Hindustan .

Nv. Daulatrao Domaji Raut​

Vicharak , MBVM

Our Message to Nation : Janeu Chhodo , Bharat Jodo    

Saturday, August 29, 2015

Mul Bhartiya Vichar Manch :

Videshi Brahmins claimed they are Aryan , Native people claim we are Hindus separate from Brahmin Arya .

Almost all Brahmins claim that they are Brahmin Aryan . Dayanand , Tilak , Sawarkar , Golwalkar and innumerable many Brahmins proudly said they are Videshi Aryan Brahmins . Many have written books in support of their Aryan origin and superiority over other Non Brahmin people .

Mahatma Phule and his followers like Jedhe - Jawalkar , Gandhi , Shahu , Ambedkar claimed Native people are Hindus and separate from Videshi Arya Brahmins . Phule very clearly states all Non Brahmins including Kshatriya, Vaishya are Native Hindus and separate from Videshi Brahmins . So also Phule said Native People's religion is Hindu Dharm based on Satya or in other words Satya Hindu Dharm which have no Varn and Caste system of Videshi Brahmin Dharm

Mahatma Phule's thinking is briefed as follows :

Phule used the Aryan theory to his own advantage: the fact that upper castes leaders
traced their origin from Aryan conquerors could be used to argue that they descended from
foreigners and that their culture, including the caste system was alien to India’s original
people. Phule, therefore, portrayed the Aryans as invaders who had settled in India at a rather
late period to subjugate the first inhabitants of India and destroyed their civilisation. For him,
the low castes were the descendants of these people. In this reinterpretation of the past, the
invaders are identified as Brahmins whereas the indigenous groups are described as
descending from the original ruling class, the Kshatriyas. In Phule’s ideology, this category
does not refer to the second varna but to includes ‘all original Indians, from Kunbi-Marathas
through Mahars’
42
. The king of these original Kshatriyas, Bali, was described by Phule as
reigning over a rich and prosperous country made of "milk and honey"

We Native Rule Movement , Mul Bhartiya Vichar Manch , Satya Hindu Dharm Sabha and Native People's Party follow Dharmatma Kabir and Mahatma Phule and proudly say that we are Native people . Our Hindu Dharm is separate from Videshi Brahmin Dharm .

Jedhe - Jawalkar who were Gandhiji's close associates in Maharashtra insisted for Non Brahmin Movement with the blessing from Gandhiji .

Nv. D.D.Raut ,
Vicharak , MBVM

Our Message to Nation : Janeu Chhodo , Bharat Jodo

Thursday, August 27, 2015

Native People's Party :

When ever Native Hindus demand some benefits as Hindu caste why Videshi Brahmins get desperate and angry ?

Hindus namely Kshtriyas , Vaishyas , Patels , Maraathas , Nairs , Jaats , Dhangar etc when they ask some benefits as Hindus why Brahmins are getting unhappy and angry is not know .

It may be because Brahmins are not Hindus and Hindusthani .

Videshi Brahmins are basically following Vedic Brahmin Dharm which they have codified in Sanskrit language . This language speaking people strength is 1400 people now . They were recorded about 45000 but dwindled to 1400 now . It means real Videshi Brahmins are about 1 crore and even they do not speak this language regularly except during Brahmin rituals and ceremony . Brahmins have shifted their language now to other languages and do not bother for Sanskrit any more at the same time they want to spend thousands of crores rupees from government funds which are public money of Hindus for fancy of Brahmin language Sanskrit . Hindus keep quite on this wasteful expenditure but when Hindus ask some benefits as Hindus like reservation Videshi Brahmins get angry and unhappy .

The Supreme Court has given verdict that reservation can not be more than 51 per cent but they are not telling how small section  3 per cent Videshi Brahmins can have benefit of 49 per cent open category ? It means the verdict of SC is faulty . Why Majority Native people , Hindus should accept that ?

Study of Native Hindus and Videshi Brahmins were carried out many times . It can be noted from Hutton study that Videshi Brahmins and Native were separated and effect of Sanskritinization was also studied . It reveals that Videshi Brahmins are basically very small population who speak Sankrit and that position remain still as it is as Non Brahmins do not speak Sanskrit and bother for that . In fact Sankrit is not oriental language but admixture of languages formed very very late and lost quickly importance as it was never accepted by Native Hindus as their language .

Hutton, the Census Commissioner for the 1931 Census, enlisted the services of Dr. B.
S. Guha, who subsequently took over as the first Director of the Anthropological Survey
of India. The latter carried out a survey in the entire sub-continent on the basis of
anthropometric and somatoscopic observations. Guha measured in all 3,771 persons
belonging to 51 racial strains and took measurements on 18 different characteristics,
besides recording a number of somatoscopic observations on skin, eye and hair colours
for isolating the racial types. The survey covered the aboriginal population as well as
the so-called lowest castes to throw light on (a) the racial types present among the
tribals and the lower classes of Indian population and (b) the extent to which inter-
mixture might have occurred between (I) the Brahmin and upper stratum of the rest of
the population and (ii) between the latter and the aboriginal population.

Brahmins are a dying community now have lost fertility and suffering from numerous diseases like diabetics , heart attacks due to obesity obtained due to Fokat eating etc habits .Even the 3 per cent Videshi Brahmins are not pure and one but they follow Varn and Caste system within Brahmin themselves . It is understood that Mishra , Vajpai etc are looked down upon as lower Brahmins and GSB , Bhumihar as non Brahmins and Parshuram followers as second rated Brahmins as his mother was Non Brahmin .

But when it comes to opposing even these upper - lower Brahmins come together for opposing Hindu Non Brahmins . Why it is so ?

Nv. D.D.Raut , President , NPP

Our Message to Nation : Janeu Chhodo , Bharat Jodo 

Wednesday, July 22, 2015

Mul Bhartiya Vichar Manch
Brahmin and Brahminism as defined by their originator Videshi Brahmins . They proposed , we disposed as the things stand :
Who are Brahmin ?
Brahmins are Videshi invaders . They invaded Hindustan and destroyed Native Hindustani Sindhu Civilizations , killing several lakhs of Native people . They say Brahmins are born from the mouth of Brahma their adi Purusha as per their Brahmin Dharm Granth Rigveda hymn of Purusha Sukta .
Brahmin is a Varn in Vedic Brahmin Dharm , and also Jaat or Caste of people who are members of it Members are sub divided into numerous communities of Brahmins known as Gotras . Brahmins are singular Varn and Jat and all other Non Brahmins are Native subordinate in various degrees . No Native Hindu who are called by Brahmins as Kshtriya , Vaishya , Shudra or Untouchable is equal in status with Videshi Brahmin .
What is Brahminism or Brahminwad ?
Videshi Brahmins say they are Lords of all Non Brahmins , Shudra etc desertion of life for the sake of a Brahmin causes the ultimate bliss of outcasts , Shudras ---.A Shudra should serve the Brahmins for the sake of heaven or for the sake of both Heaven and Livelihood ---. Mostly to serve the Brahmins is declared to be the most excellent occupation of Shudras , for he does anything other than this is profits to him nothing . His means of life should be arranged by Brahmins in accordance with what is fitting . The leaving of food should be given to him and old clothes so too the rotten part of the grain and so too the old furniture . An accumulation of wealth should not be made by Shudra even if he is able, for Shudra getting possession of wealth merely injures the Brahmins .
So it is clear fro above clarification that both Brahmin and Brahminism or Brahminwad are inseparable . No Brahmin on earth deny this .
Now the question is what made Non Brahmins to say Brahmins and Brahminism or Brahminwad are separate ? We see some Non Brahmin saying that Brahmins and Brahminsm are separate and they say Brahminism is condemnable not Varn or Jat Brahmin . It means they agree that there is Brahmin Varn born from mouth of rapist Brahmha and also they agree to chaturvarn , untochability , bhedbahv etc etc. Now they can not go to Brahmins house for Buttermilk and hide the Bowl they want to collect from Brahmin houses , people , their society , organizations and political parties . They go to the extent of making show that they are progressive , humanist etc etc.
Their other argument in favor of supporting or not criticizing Brahmin is that there are some good Brahmins . Their definition of Good Brahmin is wonderful and they never disclose that what is mean by Good Brahmin ? Their goodness is connected to their own interest and not not of whole society , Nation and Native people .
They say some of the good Brahmins were with Gandhiji and Ambedkar . We say Gandhiji and Dr Ambedkar were good enough to keep them with them and nothing had gone wrong had they not kept Brahmin company . In fact Nation would have gained tremendously had these so called Brahmins not been with these great leaders . We have No Brahmins , in our organizations and we find it is perfectly OK as we need not to wash dirty wounds and clothes of dirty Brahmins . The greatest and holiest duty of any citizen is to protect their house , land , family and country . These Brahamin lover Non Brahmiins do not want to perform that duty at the same time want all benefits on the toil of those Native people who perform these holy duty . We call such Non Brahmin , Videshi Brahmin lovers Jaichands . And only Jaichands can say Brahmin and Brahminism or Brahminwad are separate . We are not Jaichands , so we say Brahmin and Brahminwad are inseparable and both condemnable, fit for wiping out and finished .
Nv. D.D.Raut ,
Vicharak , MBVM
Our Message to Nation : Janeu Chhodo , Bharat Jodo

Tuesday, July 14, 2015

Dr. B. R. Ambedkar in explanation of his
RESIGNATION
The House I am sure knows, unofficially if not officially, that I have ceased to be a Member of the Cabinet. I tendered my resignation on Thursday the 27th September to the Prime Minister and asked him to relieve me immediately. The Prime Minister was good enough to accept the same on the very next day. If I have continued to be a Minister after Friday the 28th, it is because the Prime Minister had requested me to continue till the end of the Session—a request to which I was, in obedience to constitutional convention, bound to assent.
Our Rules of Procedure permit a Minister who has resigned his office, to make a personal statement in explanation of his resignation, Many members of Cabinet have resigned during my tenure of office. There has been however no uniform practice in the matter of Ministers who have resigned making a statement. Some have gone without making a statement and others have gone after making a statement. For a few days I was hesitant what course to follow. After taking all circumstances into consideration I came to the conclusion that the making of a statement was not merely necessary, but it was a duty which a member who has resigned owes to the House.
The House has no opportunity to know how the Cabinet works from within, whether there is harmony or whether there is a conflict, for the simple reason that there is a joint responsibility under which a member who is in a minority is not entitled to disclose his differences. Consequently the House continues to think that there is no conflict among members of Cabinet even when as a matter of fact a conflict exists. It is, therefore, a duty of a retiring Minister to make a statement informing the House why he wants to go and why he is not able to continue to take further joint responsibility.
Secondly, if a Minister goes without making a statement, people may suspect that there is something wrong with the conduct of the Minister, either in his public capacity or in his private capacity. No Minister should, I think, leave room for such suspicion and the only safe way out is a statement.
Thirdly we have our newspapers. They have their age-old bias in favour of some and against others. Their judgements are seldom based on merits. Wherever they find an empty space, they are prone to fill the vacuum by supplying grounds for resignation which are not the real grounds but which put those whom they favour in a better light and those not in their favour in a bad light. Some such thing I see has happened even in my case.
It is for these reasons that I decided to make a statement before going out.
It is now 4 years, I month and 26 days since I was called by the Prime Minister to accept the office of Law Minister in his Cabinet. The offer came as a great surprise to me. I was in the opposite camp and had already been condemned as unworthy of association when the interim Government was formed in August 1946. I was left to speculate as to what could have happened to bring about this change in the attitude of the Prime Minister. I had my doubts. I did not know how I could carry on with those who had never been my friends. I had doubts as to whether I could, as a Law Member, maintain the standard of legal knowledge and acumen which had been maintained by those who had preceded me as Law Ministers of the Government of India. But I kept my doubts at rest and accepted the offer of the Prime Minister on the ground that I should not deny my co-operation when it was asked for in the building up of our nation. The quality of my performance as a Member of the Cabinet and as Law Minister, I must leave it to others to judge.
I will now refer to matters which have led me to sever my connection with my colleagues. The urge to go has been growing from long past due to variety of reasons.
I will first refer to matters purely of a personal character and which are the least of the grounds which have led me to tender my resignation. As a result of my being a member of the Viceroy's Executive Council, I knew the Law Ministry to be administratively of no importance. It gave no opportunity for shaping the policy of the Government of India. We used to call it an empty soap box only good for old lawyers to play with. When the Prime Minister made me the offer, I told him that besides being a lawyer by my education and experience, I was competent to run any administrative Department and that in the old Viceroy's Executive Council I held two administrative portfolios, that of Labour and C.P.W.D., where a great deal of planning projects were dealt with by me and would like to have some administrative portfolio. The Prime Minister agreed and said he would give me in addition to Law the Planning Department which, he said, he was intending to create. Unfortunately the Planning Department came very late in the day and when it did come I was left out. During my time, there have been many transfers of portfolios from one Minister to another. I thought I might be considered for any one of them. But I have always been left out of consideration. Many Ministers have been given two or three portfolios so that they have been overburdened. Others like me have been wanting more work. I have not even been considered for holding a portfolio temporarily when a Minister in charge has gone abroad for a few days. It is difficult to understand what is the principle underlying the distribution of Government work among Ministers which the Prime Minister follows. Is it capacity? Is it trust? Is it friendship? Is it pliability? I was not even appointed to be a member of main Committees of the Cabinet such as the Foreign Affairs Committee or the Defence Committee. When the Economic Affairs Committee was formed, I expected, in view of the fact that I was primarily a student of Economics and Finance, to be appointed to this Committee. But I was left out. I was appointed to it by the Cabinet, when the Prime Minister had gone to England. But when he returned, in one of his many essays in the reconstruction of the Cabinet, he left me out. In a subsequent reconstruction my name was added to the Committee, but that was as a result of my protest.
The Prime Minister, I am sure, will agree that I have never complained to him in this connection. I have never been a party to the game of power politics inside the Cabinet or the game of snatching portfolios which goes on when there is a vacancy. I believe in service, service in the post which the Prime Minister, who as the head of the Cabinet, thought fit to assign to me. It would have, however, been quite unhuman for me not to have felt that a wrong was being done to me.
I will now refer to another matter that had made me dissatisfied with the Government. It relates to the treatment accorded to the Backward Classes and the Scheduled Castes. I was very sorry that the Constitution did not embody any safeguards for the Backward Classes. It was left to be done by the Executive Government on the basis of the recommendations of a Commission to be appointed by the President. More than a year has elapsed since we passed the Constitution. But the Government has not even thought of appointing the Commission. The year 1946 during which I was out of office, was a year of great anxiety to me and to the leading members of the Scheduled Castes. The British had resided from the commitments they had made in the matter of constitutional safeguards for the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Castes had no knowing as to what the Constituent Assembly would do in that behalf. In this period of anxiety I had prepared a report*[f14] on the condition of the Scheduled Castes for submission to the United Nations. But I did not submit it. I felt that it would be better to wait until the Constituent Assembly and the future Parliament was given a chance to deal with the matter. The provisions made in the Constitution for safeguarding the position of the Scheduled Castes were not to my satisfaction. However, I accepted them for what they were worth, hoping that the Government will show some determination to make them effective. What is the position of the Scheduled Castes today? So far as I see, it is the same as before. The same old tyranny, the same old oppression, the same old discrimination which existed before, exists now, and perhaps in a worst form. I can refer to hundreds of cases where people from the Scheduled Castes round about Delhi and adjoining places have come to me with their tales of woes against the Caste Hindus and against the Police who have refused to register their complaints and render them any help. I have been wondering whether there is any other parallel in the world to the condition of the Scheduled Castes in India. I cannot find any. And yet why is no relief granted to the Scheduled Castes? Compare the concern the Government shows over safeguarding the Muslims. The Prime Minister's whole time and attention is devoted for the protection of the Muslims. I yield to none, not even to the Prime Minister, in my desire to give the Muslims of India the utmost protection wherever and whenever they stand in need of it. But what I want to know is, are the Muslims the only people who need protection? Are the Scheduled Castes, the Scheduled Tribes and the Indian Christians not in need of protection? What concern has he shown for these communities? So far as I know, none and yet these are the communities which need far more care and attention than the Muslims.
I could not contain within myself the indignation I have felt over the neglect of the Scheduled Castes by the Government and on one occasion I gave vent to my feelings at a public meeting of the Scheduled Castes. A question was asked, from the Hon'ble the Home Minister, whether my charge that the Scheduled Castes had not benefited by the rule which guaranteed to them 12 1/2, per cent representation was true. In answer to the question the Hon'ble the Home Minister was pleased to say that my charge was baseless. Subsequently for some reason—it may be for satisfying the qualms of his conscience—he, I am informed, sent round a circular to the various Departments of the Government of India asking them to report how many Scheduled Caste candidates had been recently recruited in Government service. I am informed that most Departments said in reply ' NIL ' or nearly nil. If my information is correct, I need make no commentary on the answer given by the Hon'ble the Home Minister.
From my early childhood I have dedicated myself to the upliftment of the Scheduled Castes among whom I was born. It is not that there were no temptations in my way. If I had considered my own interests, I could have been anything I wanted to be and if I had joined the Congress I would have reached to the highest place in that organisation. But as I said, I had dedicated myself to the upliftment of the Scheduled Castes and I have followed the adage which says that it is better to be narrow-minded if you wish to be enthusiastic about a cause which you wish to accomplish. You can therefore, well imagine what pain it has caused me to see that the cause of the Scheduled Castes has been relegated to the limbo of nothing.
The third matter which has given me cause, not merely for dissatisfaction but for actual anxiety and even worry, is the foreign policy of the country. Any one, who has followed the course of our foreign policy and along with it the attitude of other countries towards India, could not fail to realise the sudden change that has taken place in their attitude towards us. On 15th of August 1947 when we began our life as an independent country, there was no country which wished us ill. Every country in the world was our friend. Today, after four years, all our friends have deserted us. We have no friends left. We have alienated ourselves. We are pursuing a lonely furrow with no one even to second our resolutions in the U.N.O. When I think of our foreign policy, I am reminded of what Bismark and Bernard Shaw have said. Bismark has said that " politics is not a game of realising the ideal. Politics is the game of the possible. " Bernard Shaw not very long ago said that good ideals are good but one must not forget that it is often dangerous to be too good. Our foreign policy is in complete opposition to these words of wisdom uttered by two of the world's greatest men.
How dangerous it has been to us this policy of doing the impossible and of being too good is illustrated by the great drain on our resources made by our military expenditure, by the difficulty of getting food for our starving millions and by difficulty of getting aid for the industrialisation of our country.
Out of 350 crores of rupees of revenue we raise annually, we spend about Rs. 180 crores of rupees on the Army. It is a colossal expenditure which has hardly any parallel. This colossal expenditure is the direct result of our foreign policy. We have to foot the whole of our Bill for our defence ourselves because we have no friends on which we can depend for help in any emergency that may arise. I have been wondering whether this is the right sort of foreign policy.
Our quarrel with Pakistan is a part of our foreign policy about which I feel deeply dissatisfied. There are two grounds which have disturbed our relations with Pakistan—one is Kashmir and the other is the condition of our people in East Bengal. I felt that we should be more deeply concerned with East Bengal where the condition of our people seems from all the newspapers intolerable than with Kashmir. Notwithstanding this we have been staking our all on the Kashmir issue. Even then I feel that we have been fighting on an unreal issue. The issue on which we are fighting most of the time is, who is in the right and who is in the wrong. The real issue to my mind is not who is in the right but what is right. Taking that to be the main question, my view has always been that the right solution is to partition Kashmir. Give the Hindu and Buddhist part to India and the Muslim part to Pakistan as we did in the case of India. We are really not concerned with the Muslim part of Kashmir. It is a matter between the Muslims of Kashmir and Pakistan. They may decide the issue as they like. Or if you like, divide it into three parts; the Cease-fire zone, the Valley and the Jammu-Ladhak Region and have a plebiscite only in the Valley. What I am afraid of is that in the proposed plebiscite, which is to be an overall plebiscite, the Hindus and Buddhists of Kashmir are likely to be dragged into Pakistan against their wishes and we may have to face the same problems as we are facing today in East Bengal.
I will now refer to the Fourth matter which has a good deal to do with my resignation. The Cabinet has become a merely recording and registration office of decisions already arrived at by Committees. As I have said, the Cabinet now works by Committees.
There is a Defence Committee. There is a Foreign Committee. All important matters relating to Foreign affairs are dealt with by it. All matters relating to Defence are disposed of by the Defence Committee. The same members of the Cabinet are appointed by them. I am not a member of either of these Committees. They work behind an iron curtain. Others who are not members have only to take joint responsibility without any opportunity of taking part in the shaping of policy. This is an impossible position.
I will now deal with a matter which has led me finally to come to the decision that I should resign. It is the treatment which was accorded to the Hindu Code. The Bill was introduced in this House on the 11th April 1947. After a life of four years, it was killed and died unwept and unsung, after 4 clauses of it were passed. While it was before the House, it lived by fits and starts. For full one year the Government did not feel it necessary to refer it to a Select Committee. It was referred to the Select Committee on 9th April
1948. The Report was presented to the House on 12th August 1948. The motion for the consideration of the Report was made by me on 31st August 1948. It was merely for making the motion that the Bill was kept on the Agenda. The discussion of the motion was not allowed to take place until the February Session of the year
1949. Even then it was not allowed to have a continuous discussion. It was distributed over 10 months, 4 days in February, I day in March and 2 days in April 1949. After this, one day was given to the Bill in December 1949, namely the 19th December on which day the House adopted my motion that the Bill as reported by the Select Committee be taken into consideration. No time was given to the Bill in the year 1950. Next time the Bill came before the House was on 5th February 1951 when the clause by clause consideration of the Bill was taken. Only three days 5th, 6th and 7th of February were given to the Bill and left there to rot.
This being the last Session of the present Parliament, Cabinet had to consider whether the Hindu Code Bill should be got through before this Parliament ended or whether it should be left over to the new Parliament. The Cabinet unanimously decided that it should be put through in this Parliament. So the Bill was put on the Agenda and was taken up on the 17th September 1951 for further clause by clause consideration. As the discussion was going on the Prime Minister put forth a new proposal, namely, that the Bill as a whole may not be got through within the time available and that it was desirable to get a part of it enacted into law rather than allow the whole of it to go to waste. It was a great wrench to me. But I agreed, for, as the proverb says " it is better to save a part when the whole is likely to be lost". The Prime Minister suggested that we should select the Marriage and Divorce part. The Bill in its truncated "form went on. After two or three days of discussion of the Bill the Prime Minister came up with another proposal. This time his proposal was to drop the whole Bill even the Marriage and Divorce portion. This came to me as a great shock—a bolt from the blue. I was stunned and could not say anything. I am not prepared to accept that the dropping of this truncated Bill was due to want of time. I am sure that the truncated Bill was dropped because other and more powerful members of the Cabinet wanted precedence for their Bills. I am unable to understand how the Benaras and Aligarh University Bills, how the Press Bill could have been given precedence over the Hindu Code even in its attenuated form? It is not that there was no law on the Statute Book to govern the Aligarh University or the Benaras University. It is not that these Universities would have gone to wreck and ruins if the Bills had not been passed in this session. It is not that the Press Bill was urgent. There is already a law on the Statute Book and the Bill could have waited. I got the impression that the Prime Minister, although sincere, had not the earnestness and determination required to get the Hindu Code Bill through.
In regard to this Bill I have been made to go through the greatest mental torture. The aid of Party Machinery was denied to me. The Prime Minister gave freedom of Vote, an unusual thing in the history of the Party. I did not mind it. But I expected two things. I expected a party whip as to time limit on speeches and instruction to the Chief Whip to move closure when sufficient debate had taken place. A whip on time limit on speeches would have got the Bill through. When freedom of voting was given there could have been no objection to have given a whip for time limit on speeches. But such a whip was never issued. The conduct of the Minister for Parliamentary Affairs, who is also the Chief Whip of the Party in connection with the Hindu Code, to say the least, has been most extraordinary. He has been the deadliest opponent of the Code and has never been present to aid me by moving a closure motion. For days and hours filibustering has gone on a single clause. But the Chief Whip, whose duty it is to economise Government time and push on Government Business, has been systematically absent when the Hindu Code has been under consideration in the House. I have never seen a case of a Chief Whip so disloyal to the Prime Minister and a Prime Minister so loyal to a disloyal Whip.
Notwithstanding this unconstitutional behaviour, the Chief Whip is really a darling of the Prime Minister. For notwithstanding his disloyalty he got a promotion in the Party organisation. It is impossible to carry on in such circumstances.
It has been said that the Bill had to be dropped because the opposition was strong. How strong was the opposition? This Bill has been discussed several times in the Party and was carried to division by the opponents. Every time the opponents were routed. The last time when the Bill was taken up in the Party Meeting, out of 120 only 20 were found to be against it. When the Bill was taken in the Party for discussion, 44 clauses were passed in about 3 1/2 hours time. This shows how much opposition there was to the Bill within the Party. In the House itself there have been divisions on three clauses of the Bill—2, 3 and 4. Every time there has been a overwhelming majority in favour even on clause 4 which is the soul of the Hindu Code.
I was therefore, quite unable to accept the Prime Minister's decision to abandon the Bill on the ground of time. I have been obliged to give this elaborate explanation for my resignation because some people have suggested that I am going because of my illness. I wish to repudiate any such suggestion. I am the last man to abandon my duty because of illness.
It may be said that my resignation is out of time and that if I was dissatisfied with the Foreign Policy of the Government and the treatment accorded to Backward Classes and the Scheduled Castes I should have gone earlier. The charge may sound as true. But I had reasons which held me back. In the first place, most of the time I have been a member of the Cabinet, I have been busy with the framing of the Constitution. It absorbed all my attention till 26th January 1950 and thereafter I was concerned with the Peoples' Representation Bill and the Delimitation Orders. I had hardly any time to attend to our Foreign Affairs. I did not think it right to go away leaving this work unfinished.
In the second place, I thought it necessary to stay on, for the sake of the Hindu Code. In the opinion of some it may be wrong for me to have held on for the sake of the Hindu Code. I took a different view. The Hindu Code was the greatest social reform measure ever undertaken by the Legislature in this country. No law passed by the Indian Legislature in the past or likely to be passed in the future can be compared to it in point of its significance.
To leave inequality between class and class, between sex and sex which is the soul of Hindu Society untouched and to go on passing legislation relating to economic problems is to make a farce of our Constitution and to build a palace on a dung heap. This is the significance I attached to the Hindu Code. It is for its sake that I stayed on notwithstanding my differences. So if I have committed a wrong it is in the hope of doing some good. Had I no ground for such a hope connection to refer only to three of the statements made by the Prime Minister on the floor of the House, for overcoming the obstructionist tactics of the opponents? I would like in this n 28th November, 1949 the Prime Minister gave the following assurance. He said:
" What is more, the Government is committed to this thing (Hindu Code). It is going through with it."
***
" Government would proceed with that. It is for this House to accept a measure, but if a Government takes an important measure and the House rejects it, the House rejects that Government and the Government goes and another Government comes in its place. It should be clearly understood that this is one of the important measures to which the Government attaches importance and on which it will stand or fall."
Again on 19th December 1949, the Prime Minister said :
" I do not wish the House to think in the slightest degree that we consider that this Hindu Code Bill is not of importance, because we do attach the greatest importance to it, as I said, not because of any particular clause or anything, but because of the basic approach to this vast problem in problems, economic and social. We have achieved political freedom in this country, political independence. That is a stage in the' journey, and there are other stages, economic, social and other and if society is to advance, there must be this integrated advance on all fronts."
On the 26th September 1951 the Prime Minister said:
It is not necessary for me to assure the House of the desire of Government to proceed with this measure in so far as we can proceed with it within possibilities, and so far as we are concerned we consider this matter as adjourned till such time as the next opportunity—1 hope it will be in this Parliaments—offers itself.
This was after the Prime Minister had announced the dropping of the Bill. Who could not have believed in these pronouncements of the Prime Minster? If I did not think that there could be a difference between the promises and performances of the Prime Minister the fault is certainly not mine. My exit from the Cabinet may not be a matter of much concern to anybody in this country. But I must be true to myself and that I can be only by going out. Before I do so I wish to thank my colleagues for the kindness and courtesy they have shown to me during my membership of the Cabinet. While I am not resigning my membership of Parliament I also wish to express my gratitude to Members of Parliament for having shown great tolerance towards me.
New Delhi,
10th October 1951                     

 [F1]P.D., Vol. XV, Part II, 21st September 1951, pp. 2974-3008,
Native People's Party ;

Brahmin Guru Ghantals :

What is this Brahmin Guru Ghantals ? We should go by each word . Brahmins means Videshi Brahmins. Guru means Teacher and Ghantals means making noise without doing any work .

In the past we have come across two three such cases .

First case is Videshi Brahmin Dronacharya who did not teach Eklaya the Native Boy any thing yet asked for his thumb in Daxina .
Second case is Videshi Brahmin Ramdas who never met Native King  Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj yet made propagand that he was guru of Shivaji and Shivaji has placed his kingdom in his Zoli as Guru Daxina .

Third case is Videshi Brahmin Namdar Gokhale who is called Guru of  Native Hero Mahatma Gandhi after Gandhi becoming National Leader and Mahatma . This propaganda was done by both Jahal and Moderate Videshi Brahmins which Gandhiji very politely rejected telling that he was working in socio -political field in South Africa even before meeting Gokhale in Pune . Gandhiji acknowledged greatness of Anni Besant , Dada Abdulha and Dada Bhai Navroji apart from Arnold whose book on Gita Gandhiji read at young age at London . Apart from that Gandhiji was influenced by Raichand and his Kabir Panthi Mother . Finally Gandhiji was Kabir follower of Satya Hindu Dharm .

In short we reject Guru Ghantals Dronacharya , Ramdas and Gokhale as they were sound makers and not actual gurus .

Nv. D.D.Raut , President , NPP

Our Message to Nation : Janeu Chhodo , Bharat Jodo

Sunday, July 12, 2015

MUL BHARTIYA VICHAR MANCH :

Question of Brahmins in Non Brahmin Organizations and Non Brahmins in Brahmin Organizations , a matter of serious thought :

We see there are two types of organizations , political , non political working in Hindustan . For example Congress was founded in 1885 by A.O.home , a Non Brahmin , Britisher . Many Brahmins joined it as office bearers and they took over control of that organization very soon by Brahmins and Tilak , Agarkar , Malviya , Nehru , etc . were in such a position that the whole organization was Brahminized . Only from 1920 and onwards entry of Non Brahmin M.K Gandhi from 1916 made Congress felt presence of Non Brahmins and Muslims and Brahmins immediately founded Brahminwadi RSS in 1925 helping other Brahminwadi organizations like Hindu Mahasabha etc to eliminate and create problems of Non Brahmin leadership of Gandhiji .

There were also Brahmin organizations like Hindu Mahasabha , Ram Raj Party where some Non Brahmins were members but primarily they were either fund givers , jamidars , businessmen supporting Brahminwad or those small workers for cleaning pandal, as unimportant workers. They were always told by Brahmins that they are masters and others are workers .

Now same position we see in present day political organizations founded by Brahmins and Non Brahmins . They have cells like OBC , SC , ST , Muslims in Brahmin founded parties as they are founded for Brahmin Rule and others are considered as Cells .

In Non Brahmin political parties there are cells like Minority , Christians , Muslims but not a separate cell for Brahmins . Brahmins join these parties with direct big positions like second in command and soon take whole charge of that organization or threaten to leave this organization ,party . In any case Brahmins never want to work as subordinate and never want to leave his Brahminism , Varn and Brahmin Dharm Vikruti of Vedas , Hom - Havan , Janeu , caste-ism etc .

Now the question is how good these Videshi Brahmins are for Non Brahmins in both Brahmin formed organizations and organizations formed by Non Brahmins . And in both the case we find they are useless for Non Brahmins , Native people . Therefore , we feel , Non Brahmins should not waste their time in such organizations where Brahmins are Members as the movement of Non Brahmins get stagnated and without final results such as Videshi Brahminless Society .

We see some of the organizations trying to make Videshi Brahmin faltu leaders great taking shelter of Mahatma Gandhi . Some Brahmins worked under Gandhiji , some Brahmins worked under Dr . Ambedkar but non of them said they are Not Brahmin or Left Brahmin Dharm For Ever . In fact they used Pandit , Brahmarshi , Arya etc words to show that they are Brahmins . Nehru , Malyiya , Tagore were Brahmins and remained Brahmins always .

Similarly , Non Brahmins working in Brahmin organizations were remained subordinate even after reaching the position PM . See the case of Modi , who is Non Brahmin , in Brahmin organization but can not say he will carry out census for OBC even though he himself is OBC . So Shudra remains Shurda in Brahmin organizations .

Mul Bhartiya Vichar Manch wants Native Rule , means our organization, our mind and our benefits . We reject both the types of organizations infected by Videshi Brahmins .

Nv. D.D.Raut
Vicharak , MBVM

Our Message to Nation : Janeu Chhodo , Bharat Jodo

Monday, July 6, 2015

Native People's Party

To solve problematic Videshi Brahmin resettlement in their Home Land in Artic , Modi should take Bhagwat and Advani to Russia

Tilak had already found out Home land of Videshi Brahmins in Artic which is now in and above present day Russia . Brahmins have been going to their Swa - Grah  that is Swarg frequently as per their Brahmin Dharm Vedic literature . That is Brahmha , Vishnu , Indra Lok where plenty of Somraas, Hom - Havan Cow , Horse meat and Apsaras cum Prostitutes like Rambha , Urvashi , Menaka were always available to anybody and Brahmin enemies for deceiving them . This place , they said is Swarg and said one goes to Swarg after death if one donates and give Dan , Daxina to Videshi Brahmins . It seems this was some sort of entry fee collected by brothel keeper Brahmins .

Now our PM Modi is visiting Russia . We think , he is aware how Videshi Brahmins are problematic to India and people of Hindustan . Even every Brahmin wants his Swarg and therefore , we think Modi should take RSS chief Bhagwat and waiting in PM Advani to Russia so that settlement of Videshi Brahmins in the Artic home of Brahmins can be discussed with Russian authorities and soon Advani becomes PM of Brahmin home land and Bhagwat as President . Other Brahmins can leave India once this settlement is reached . This would be peaceful solution to Videshi Brahmins problem in India as no Non Brahmin can tolerate Videshi Brahmin Dharm Vikruti any more .

Nv. D.D.Raut , President , NPP

Our Message to Nation : Janeu Chhodo , Bharat Jodo 

Monday, June 15, 2015

Mul Bhartiya Vichar Manch :

Hindustani First , then Hindu , Jain , Buddhist , Sikh , Muslim , Christian etc but never Videshi Brahmin :

Nativist D.D.Raut is Hindustani first then Hindu , Jain , Buddhist , Sikh , Muslim , Christian etc but never Videshi Brahmin as they are enemy of my Native land Hindustan .

We all Non Brahmins are Hindustani , therefore Hindu but Videshi Brahmins are aliens , foreigners and they are Brahmins and followers of Vedic Brahmin Dharm which is separate from Native Hindu Dharm and totally against Native people .

Hindustani first said Dr Ambedkar . Hindustani first said Gandhiji . Hindustani first said Nativist D.D.Raut .

Brahminwadis , Panditwadis , Manuwadis , Godsewadis , Peshva-wadis Sankaracharya-wadis , RSS -wadis , Congress-wadis, BJP-wadis have been doing all work to finish Hindustan First cherished by Gandhi - Ambedkar . They wiped out Gandhi movement and brought down Ambedkar movement to 1 per cent Ambedkarite New Buddhist which they have further reduced to 100 Guts and Divisions .

Nativist D.D.Raut brought Gandhi - Ambedkar Movement to life educating native people tirelessly that both Gandhi and Ambedkar were and are part of Native Rule Movement that is Swadeshi or Hindavi Swaraj as dreamed by our Native Heroes like Shivaji , Kabir , Fule and other Native great people , warriors and solders . Nativist said there is no contradiction in the work of Gandhiji and Ambedkar both are Native Non Brahmins . This made all Non Brahmin irrespective of their religions they follow part of 97 per cent Native People's movement segregating 3 per cent Videshi Brahmins and reducing them to powerless , helpless , beggars position asking them to Quit India .

Nv. D.D.Raut ,
Vicharak , MBVM

Our Message to Nation : Janeu Chhodo , Bharat Jodo

Tuesday, June 2, 2015

Native People's Party :

Ambedkar is not answerable to anybody , Brahminwadi , Panditwadi all parties are answerable to him ;

Brahminwadi BJP government declared Dr Ambedkar 125 th Birth Year as Samarasta Year . Panditwadi Congress is planning to celebrate Dr Ambedkar's Post Graduation Year to remind Modi that his government is not sincere in all matters of Ambedkar . Panditwadi Congress wish to raise issues like Reservation in Promotion , Revision in Atrocities Act and Consolidated Reservation Bill connected with all issues of Reservation policy , implementation etc.

Neither Congress nor BJP was ever sincere for Native people development . Both ruled for Brahminism for protecting Videshi Brahmin hegemony . As long as Native people can be fooled , they will go on fooling them but once they are awake , they will ask what is the stand of the Congress and BJP on Videshi Brahmins finally .

Therefore , we say Congress and BJP and all those Brahminwadi , Panditwadi parties are answerable to Ambedkar , Ambedkar is not answerable to them .

Nv. D.D.Raut , President , NPP

Our Message to Nation : Janeu Chhodo , Bharat Jodo

Monday, June 1, 2015

Native People's Party :

To call Videshi Brahmins inhuman and enemy of Nation and Native people is not biased against them .

Native people are not biased against any body . But it is our Native right to ask all Videshis to stop atrocities on Native people and Quit India . It is established fact that Brahmins are Videshi and the social system , religion they follow is Adharm , Varnwadi , Jaatiwadi , Bhedbhavwadi system . Our Constitution does not permit Varnwad , Caste -sm , Bhedbhav .

No government should encourage Videshi Brahmins and their Varnwad and can not expect from the Native  citizens to tolerate Brahminism , ignore that and suffer . Why we asked Videshi British to Quit India ? Why we should not ask Videshi Brahmins to Quit India ?

Varnwad , Caste-ism is not a bliss , it is not happiness . It is not development , it is not progress or Acchhe Din !

Nv. D.D.Raut , President , NPP

Our Message to Nation : Janeu Chhodo , Bharat Jodo
 

Sunday, May 31, 2015

Native People's Party :

Mahatma Gandhi is Father of Nation and Dr Ambedkar is Bharat Bhagya Vidhata being of Father of Indian Constitution : Their photos back to back should be printed on all denomination Indian currency notes . This will make doubly stopping bogus notes . These are only two Native Heroes and Leaders of Modern India whose photos should be on notes apart from our National Official Seal of Lions .

Nv. D.D.Raut , President , NPP

Our Message to Nation : Janeu Chhodo , Bharat Jodo

Wednesday, May 27, 2015

NATIVIST :

Nativist D.D.Raut , defines Nativism :

The definition of Nativism is simplified by Nativist D,D,Raut , President , Native People's Party , Vicharak , Mul Bhartiya Vichar Manch and Pracharak , Satya Hindu Dharm Sabha as follows :

Nativism : 

 " Nativism is that  political , social , economical , cultural , religious and civil system where Native people work together in an organized way as Nativist for common benefits as one Native Nation "
                                                       Nativist D.D.Raut

In Hindustan Mul Bhartiya Vichar Manch is calling this movement as Native Rule Movement . The precondition of Native Rule is sending out Videshi Brahmins , Ending Videshi Brahmin Adharm , Rejuvenating Varn-less , Caste-less , Bhedbhav Rahit Satya Hindu Dharm and establish society based on Samata , Santata and Swatntrata means Equality , Peace and Independence .

Nv. D.D.Raut , President , NPP

Our Message to Nation : Janeu Chhodo , Bharat Jodo 
NATIVIST :

Nativist D.D.Raut , defines Nativism :

The definition of Nativism is simplified by Nativist D,D,Raut , President , Native People's Party , Vicharak , Mul Bhartiya Vichar Manch and Pracharak , Satya Hindu Dharm Sabha as follows :

Nativism : 

 " Nativism is that  political , social , economical , cultural , religious and civil system where Native people work together in an organized way as Nativist for common benefits as one Native Nation "
                                                       Nativist D.D.Raut

In Hindustan Mul Bhartiya Vichar Manch is calling this movement as Native Rule Movement . The precondition of Native Rule is sending out Videshi Brahmins , Ending Videshi Brahmin Adharm , Rejuvenating Varn-less , Caste-less , Bhedbhav Rahit Satya Hindu Dharm and establish society based on Samata , Santata and Swatntrata means Equality , Peace and Independence .

Nv. D.D.Raut , President , NPP

Our Message to Nation : Janeu Chhodo , Bharat Jodo 
Native People's Party :

India , Pakistan , Bangladesh are Brothers have Native Non Brahmin Father of Nations namely Gandhi, Jinha , Mujibar Rahman  :

India , Pakistan , Bangaladesh have one ancestral civilization which is known as Sindhu Civilization , Ancient Satya Hindu Dharm and Casteless , Varnless , Videshi Brahmin free society thinking which makes them one and Brothers ,

Like Gandhi , Jinha , Mujibar Rahaman were Native Hindus following Satya Hindu Dharmi Kabir . That is why they never liked Videshi Brahmins and therefore  videshi Brahmins hated Gandhiji , Jinha .

Jinha was for Hindustan as one where as Videshi Brahmin Hindu Mahasabha was for separation . Videshi Brahmins were under the impression that Indian Hindus can be fooled for ever telling them that Videshi Brahmins are Hindu . But within 60 years , education , social work and political awareness learned the truth that Videshi Brahmins are not Hindus but a separate videshi people having their religion known as Vedic Brahmin Dharm .

Many historians , researchers and scientific studies have thousands of time proved that Brahmins are aliens , they are videshi and enemy of Native people and Hindustan . This common thinking in India , Pakistan , Bangaladesh has also made feeling of oneness among the people of these three countries who were part of Hindustan .

We therefore have no problem in accepting greatness of jinha and Mujibar Rahaman like Gandhiji . In fact Jinha's role in getting independence to Hindustan is highly appreciable . Had not Brahminwadi Pandit Nehru been made PM of India and Jinha would have given first premiership of Hindustan , there would not have been partition . Pandit Nehru and  bogus Hindu Mahasabha had hands in gloves and even Gandhiji had to suffer costing his life .

Nv. D.D.Raut , President , NPP

Our Message to Nation : Janeu Chhodo , Bharat Jodo  
Native People's Party :

India , Pakistan , Bangladesh are Brothers have Native Non Brahmin Father of Nations namely Gandhi, Jinha , Mujibar Rahman  :

India , Pakistan , Bangaladesh have one ancestral civilization which is known as Sindhu Civilization , Ancient Satya Hindu Dharm and Casteless , Varnless , Videshi Brahmin free society thinking which makes them one and Brothers ,

Like Gandhi , Jinha , Mujibar Rahaman were Native Hindus following Satya Hindu Dharmi Kabir . That is why they never liked Videshi Brahmins and therefore  videshi Brahmins hated Gandhiji , Jinha .

Jinha was for Hindustan as one where as Videshi Brahmin Hindu Mahasabha was for separation . Videshi Brahmins were under the impression that Indian Hindus can be fooled for ever telling them that Videshi Brahmins are Hindu . But within 60 years , education , social work and political awareness learned the truth that Videshi Brahmins are not Hindus but a separate videshi people having their religion known as Vedic Brahmin Dharm .

Many historians , researchers and scientific studies have thousands of time proved that Brahmins are aliens , they are videshi and enemy of Native people and Hindustan . This common thinking in India , Pakistan , Bangaladesh has also made feeling of oneness among the people of these three countries who were part of Hindustan .

We therefore have no problem in accepting greatness of jinha and Mujibar Rahaman like Gandhiji . In fact Jinha's role in getting independence to Hindustan is highly appreciable . Had not Brahminwadi Pandit Nehru been made PM of India and Jinha would have given first premiership of Hindustan , there would not have been partition . Pandit Nehru and  bogus Hindu Mahasabha had hands in gloves and even Gandhiji had to suffer costing his life .

Nv. D.D.Raut , President , NPP

Our Message to Nation : Janeu Chhodo , Bharat Jodo  

Tuesday, May 19, 2015

Mul Bhartiya Vichar Manch :

Exceptions are not Rules , Some say there are good Brahmins too , we say exceptions are not rules :

During my childhood , i remember , a  Brahmin having badly affected with deformities caused by Kodh that is Leprosy used to come to our ward which was residence of mostly Hindu Non Brahmin castes like Teli , Kunabi , Mahar , Sutar , Chamar , Mali etc . He was coming walking a distance of about 2 Kms where he was staying with mostly well to do Brahmins . Their ward was called Vithal Gujari where as our ward is called Shurkawari .

This leprosy affected Brahmins was not begging in his ward . May be other Brahmins were not giving him alms or avoiding him or out casted him . This Brahmin with deadly affected by Leprosy which is contagious in bad cases was coming to Non Brahmin Hindu ward regularly .

Otherwise , he was nice person , even he used to talk to my father also as to how is his rice business etc but when as alms giving boy , i used to give him rice from my fist and bowl , he used to warn me keep away , give from distance , you are Shudras , do not touch us Brahmin . He was behaving this not only with our caste people but other caste people also like Teli , Mali , Sutar , Kosti , Chamar and all other Non Brahmin people . This is the example of good Brahmin some people use to remind us tellinng that Brahmin and Brahminism are separate and there are good Brahmins also .

I do not say there are not good Brahmin . But that depends and differs  with person to person and time to time . But because of this rule can not be made that Brahmins are good . That is exception and negligible exception .

Brahmin in worst condition is also Brahmin never fails to remind that even by accepting alms from you , he is making favor to you . He never fails to remind you that your Varn and caste is inferior to him . He never fails to remind you that they are born to enslave you . He is like BG Tilak who had said that Brahmin rape of Native untouchable girl was for ending untouchablity .

We know Brahmins are Videshi , Good Brahmin or Bad Brahmin is no classification now . Our movement is Native Rule means Non Brahmin Rule means No Brahmin , good or bad .

Nv. D.D.Raut ,
Vicharak , MBVM

Our Message to Nation : Janeu Chhodo , Bharat Jodo   
  

Monday, May 18, 2015

HINDU :

First rapist of the world  Brahmin god Brahma and Aruna Shanbaug :

Aruna Shanbaug a staff nurse was raped by her KEM hospital staff and assaulted . Due to this bruit behavior of her rapist she went in coma and was in the same condition for more than 40 years and died yesterday . Her colleagues were taking her care all these 40 years .

Aruna Shanbaug suffered mentally and went in coma . One can understand the agony and pain . The rapist was not her relative , near and dear . But when we learn that Brahmin god Brahma had raped his own daughter Saraswati , we can understand Swaraswati's agony and pain . She had not gone in coma but suffered at her father's cruel hands . Brahma a Brahmin god is known as first rapist of the world . Brahmin history is full of such rapes and illicit sexual relations . A few more Brahmins gods have this distinction . They are Vishnu , Indra , Som and many others . Brahmin has become synonym Bastard as they are originated illicit relations in the Vedic and other Brahmin scriptures . Fule called Brahma as Madarchod, Behenchod and Betichod . Brahma was punished by Native lord Shiva . Shiva cut Brahma's head and killed him and married Saraswati to his son Ganesha .

Since that Videshi Brahmin period and due to Brahmin Adharm of Vedas , Manusmrtit etc Hindustan and Hindus suffered for last thousands years .

Aruna Shanbaug suffered rape . We notice such cases every day as this illness was originated with Brahma and spread to society down grading humanity . No where women suffered more than in Hindu and Hindustan  and the main cause of such suffering was Videshi Brahmin Dharm vikruti .

We need to change this . This can be done only when we follow our Native Hindu Dharm which is based on moralities as we find in Shiva a Native Lord and Hero who had killed Brahma punishing him fro his crime of rape of his own daughter .

Brahmin Dharm is not only separate from Hindu Dharm but it is totally opposite to Hindu Dharm and enemy of Hindus .

Nv. D.D.Raut ,
Pracharak , SHDS

Our Message to Nation : Janeu Chhodo , Bharat Jodo     

Saturday, May 9, 2015

Native People's Party :

Happy Mother's Day :

My mother's name is Krishnabai . 

Science now says Mother can produce on her own . This is Mother Power . Mother is Living God .  Hats off to Mother . My mother was my Hero all powerful .

My mother is expired . She died in 2002 at the age of about 85

To me , like any son and daughter , she was most brave , lovely and caring mother. Like any other Native village mother she did all homework , labor and farming to support her large and joint family .

My mother was joyful , story telling and even quarreling with others for us . After all she was mother like lioness .

My mother must be looking like this Mom at my young age . We were calling  our mother in marathi as MY means MAI , MOTHER.

Best Wishes to all on Mother's Day

Nv. D.D.Raut , President , NPP

Message to Nation : No Janeu at Birth , No Janeu Afterward

Wednesday, April 29, 2015

HINDU :

Need - based Hindu Dharm verses Greed - based Brahmin Dharm ;

Any religion which is founded on Need -based can be called Dharm where as when a system id founded on Greed - based is called Brahmin Dharm or Brahminwad , Manuwad , Peshwai etc. It is not Dharm but Adharm .

Native Hindus who are aboriginals of Hindustan are very simple and workaholic people . Native Hindus are known as Bara Balutedar also means doing several works which have been useful and need based . Hindus have devised an ancient religion since Sindhu Civilization period which had created wonderful cities , people , art , painting , pots and several things making peaceful life of people .

Greed - based Videshi Brahmin Dharm people came as foreigners to this land like destroying invaders like British ,Duch , French , Mongals which had taken place a few centuries ago . Brahmins were first cruel invaders who not only burnt old Hindu civil life but introduced their barbarian Brahmin Dharm which was against social harmony but for few Videshi Brahmins . Brahmin Dharm declared Brahmins are creation from head of their so called god Brahma denying equality to other 97 per cent native people . Local Raj- put , Kshetriya , Warriors , Tradesmen , Businessmen were called second graded , third graded people and small farmers - workers and other people as Shudra and Atishudra placing them in lowest order . This divisive Brahmin Dharm was based on greed or Greed -based .

As one knows , greed can never be satisfied . It is unending . Buddha, Mahaveer , Kabir , Nanak and many Native Saints tried to correct Greedy Brahmin but failed as it is their characteristic . We see this Greed -based economy even now which  called privatization , globalization . We say this is Brahminwad , Brahmin Dharm which is also harmful to Hindustan and Native people as was Videshi Brahmin Dharm .

How to end this Greed- based Brahmin Dharm ?

Two fold work will require . One safeguard yourself against such greedy people second drive out them by Gandhian way calling them to Quit India . We forgive our enemies also that is why we say ' Quit India '

Nv. D.D.Raut ,
Pracharak , SHDS

Our Message to Nation : Janeu Chhodo , Bharat Jodo  

Monday, April 27, 2015

HINDU :

The bad habit of Brahminization is not only in Videshi Brahmins but it is ignorantly present in Non Brahmin Native people too :

Videshi Brahmins have been Brahminizing Native things for their benefits . They do not even bother to say Dr Ambedkar was helpful to Savarkar in Gandhi murder case and admirer of Brahminwadi RSS. Videshi Brahmins are doing this propaganda as it benefits them . The other phrase used for Brahminizing is Sanskritnizing . For example we know Sanskrit is a notorious code language fabricated by Videshi Brahmins stilling words and grammar from Native languages like Pali and Prakrut etc and making false propaganda that the fake Sanskrit is mother of Hindustani languages . Brahmins do such Brahminikaran as that gives them prestige and honor . But when Non Brahmins fall in the same trap and do Brahminization of Native things and people , we feel sorry for such Non Brahmin people.

Some Non Brahmin people call that Sai Baba and Gajanan Maharaj were Brahmins  forgetting that Native people too have rightly achieved greatness making charity and good deeds acknowledged by people giving them saintly hood like what happened in the case of Sai Baba and Gajanan Maharaj . We should not forget that Tukadoji Maharaj and Gadge Baba too have achieved greatness in the eyes of Native Non Brahmin people like Saint Tukarm , Saint Namdev , Saint Gora , Saint Chokha etc . Thanks that Native Non Brahmin people not yet said these people were Brahmins  !

Brahmins claimed this land , we kept quite , Brahmins claimed themselves as Hindu we kept quite , Brehmins claimed Sanskrit is mother of all languages we kept quite . This is one side claiming similar way other side offering story is Saibaba and Gajanan Maharaj are Brahmins . This offering we call Native Non Brahmin Nonsense !

Nv. D.D.Raut
Prachark , SHDS

Our Message to Nation : Janeu Chhodo , Bharat Jodo  

Thursday, April 23, 2015

Native People's Party :

Rajasthan Farmer Gajendra Singh Suicide is clear failure of BJP Rajastan and Modi Government :

Rajasthan farmer Gajendra Singh who did suicide at Kisan Rally of APP at Delhi shows clear failure of BJP 'S Rajasthan Government and Modi policies on land acquisition .

Note left by Gajendra Singh shows that he was unhappy with Modi on land acquisition bill which he felt is anti farmers and Vsundhara Raje Sindhiya BJP CM Rajasthan as he any many farmers from Rajastan suffered heavy loss but government help was not coming.

This suicide was done under the nose of Modi at Delhi . Both Modi and Kejariwal governments failed to save poor farmers .

No Brahminwadi government can be pro farmers as they are Native people .

Nv. D.D.Raut , President , NPP

Our Message to Nation : Janeu Chhodo , Bharat Jodo

Friday, April 10, 2015

Native People's Party : Views :
The Grand Father of India Mahatma Phule Is our inspiration :
Mahatma Phule Jayanti is falling on 11 th April . We wish best to Native people and desire to review where we stand in national politics .
Native People's Party is a main stream political party of India . We do not believe in Caste and Varn and therefore , we advocate Satya Hindu Dharm for Native Hindus . We believe in Hindu Vohi , Jo Brahmin Nahi. We believe in Hindutva Vahi , Jisme Brahmin Bilkul Nahi. Our Message to Nation is : Janeu Chhodo , Bharat Jodo .
We believe all people other than Videshi Brahmins are Native people and we believe that there was no contradiction among Phule , Gandhi , Ambedkar so far work for Swadeshi people is concerned . Gandhi and Ambedkar both were admirer of Mahatma Fule and can be rightly called The Grand Father of India .
Mahatma Fule wanted Videshi Brahmins should be driven out of Hindustan as he felt they were enemy of not only Hindus but of Nation also . Fule never felt shy or afraid of any body calling Videshi Brahmin Dharm as Adharm and against Hindus . He wished to reestablish Satya Hindu Dharm once again defining the same . To further his work Native People's Party , Satya Hindu Dharm Sabha and Mul Bhartiya Vichar Manch have been educating native people that Holy Bijak where Dharmatma Kabir revealed Satya Hindu Dharm is the only Code Book Of Hindu Dharm which totally rejects Videshi Brahmin Dharm , Vedas , Janeu , Hom- Havan , rapist gods Brahma , Vishnu , Indra , Som etc and Varn , Caste system .
Those who believe in Fule will understand the work of Gandhi and Ambedkar that they were working for all Native people and have no contradiction .Those who recognize Fule as The Grand Father of India have no problem in recognizing Mahatma Gandhi as Father of Nation and Dr Ambedkar as Bharat Bhagya Vidhata .
Many Videshi Brahmins, their agents and fools who can not understand these great Native Heroes speak wrong about them .
Mahatmas have always forgiven them .
Nv. D.D.Raut , President , NPP
Our Message to Nation : Janeu Chhodo , Bharat Jodo

Tuesday, March 31, 2015

Native News :

On Feku Day we expect Feku News of getting everybody 15 lacs Black money from Feku Government headed by Feku Modi :

Today is April First . People say it is April Fool Day world over but in India it is special day known as Fekam Fak or Feku Day . The Nation has been getting such Fekam Fak news last one year . We think this April First is it's anniversary .

Modi our PM has promised every citizen 15 lacs rupees in their bank account asking banks to open chota khata of BPL people who had no money to open a Bank Account . Modi government has been patting on self back for having opened many such accounts from the poor people doing Fekugiri that they will get credit of 15 lacs soon in their account . Then they said it was Chunavi Jumala means just make fool people and not true promise .

If this is the way of governing by Modi Government , then people are correct to call him Feku and his government as Feku Government . This reminds people April Fool Day which is today and therefore , people have now renamed as Feku Day dedicated to Modi and his government .

PM Modi 's Party BJP and mother of BJP RSS are also no less in such matters . BJP recently made Feku Claim that they are Biggest Political Party in world with Miscall registration  and RSS saying that they want classless society . Why not they said Varnless society ? Why not Casteless society ? Why not Janeu less society ? It is because they too are mother of Jumala Party and Government .

Although this day is Feku Day with sole property of Modi , BJP and RSS ,we are very serious and write this news with all seriousness that we are committed to end Fekugiri from Nation .

Nv. D.D.Raut , President , NPP .

Our Message to Nation : Janeu Chhodo , Bharat Jodo

Monday, March 30, 2015

Satya Hindu Dharm Sabha : Satsang :

Videshi Brahmin bhagane ke liye Dharmantaran ki nahi Dharya aur Shourya ki jarurat .

Satya H

Hamane kaha " Hindu Vohi , Jo Brahmin Nahi. "

Dusari galat dharana thi Videshi Brahmin rapist gods Brahma , Vishnu , Indra , Som aadi ka Hindu Dharm se koi lene dena nahi . Hamare Native Non Brahmin Dharmatama , Saint , Maha purush jaise Shiv , Ram , Krishna , Dharmatma Kabir , Namdev , Tukarm ,Saibaba , Gadgebaba , Tukadoji Maharaj aur anya Non Brahmin Sadhu , Saint hi Hindu Dharm ko pujyaniya hai , koi bhi Videshi Brahmin nahi .

Tisari galat dharana thi ki Videshi Brahmino se ppoja , vidhi karayi jaati thi vo hamane galat saabit kar diya . Hamare Hindu Aadiwashi , kabhi Videshi Brahmino ko nahi bulate the . Tukadoji Maharaj kisi Brahmin se nahi Hindu Non Brahmin se hi Shadi , Pooja karate the . Aaaj kai Non Brahmin Maratha , Non Brahmin OBC , SC, ST , NT apani pooja khud karate hai , Videshi Brahmin ko najadik aane bhi nahi dete .

Hom - Havan , Gayatri , Janeu ye Videshi Brahmin ki Vikruti hai ese Hindu Dharm me koi sthan nahi . Ye Videshi Brahmino ke pet bharane ke dhande hai hamara Hindu Dharm nahi . Ye dharana ab Hindu samaj manane laga hai .

Varn , Jaati, Uchnich , Bhedbhav ye Videshi Brahmin Dharm hai aur Videshi Brahmin Hindu Dharm se na kewal alag hai ve ek dusare ke virodhi hai kyu ki Satya Hindu Dharm me na Ved ko mantya hai nahi Vedic rapist bhagwan , pooja , hom -havan , jaati , janeu ko manyata hai .

Hindu Dharm ka ek matra granth hai Holy Bijak aur Bijak ki ek sakhi , Vani bhi kisi bhi ppoja ke liye paryapt hai .

Videshi Brahmin bhagane ke liye dharmantaran ki nahi dharya aur shourya ki jarurat hai jo Hindu Dharm me pahale se moujud hai kewal use hawa deneki , jagane ki jarurat hai kyu ki es desh me Videshi Brahmin bhagane ka hosala Hindu bhi rakahte hai .

Nv. D.D.Raut ,

Pracharak , SHDS

Our Message to Nation : Janeu Chhodo , Bharat Jodo
indu Dharm Sabha Hindu Dharmiyo me jo bhav jaga raha hai usase bahut saari galat dharnaye dur ho rahi hai . Pahali galat dharna ye thi ki Videshi Brahmin Dharm aur Swadeshi Hindu Dharm ek hi hai . Es galat dharna ko hamane dur kar diya .